madvise和fadvise的区别

madvise() and posix_fadvise() are not synonymous. madvise() tells the kernel (give advise) what to do with existing memory region while fadvise() tells the kernel what to do with cached (or future cache) of a file data.

For example, if you mmap() anonymous region you should use madvise() to hint the kernal not to swap out (MADV_RANDOM) or to swap out only after access. (MADV_SEQUENTIAL)

If you mmap() a file, or part of a file, you can use either madvise() or fadvise() to hint the kernel to readahead for you (MADV_WILLNEED) or to free that cache (MADV_DONTNEED) or to free after access (POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE, fadvise() only) in additional to the above.

If you use file without mapping the data to your process memory (without using mmap()), you should use fadvise() only. madvise() has no meaning.

As far as kernel subsystem, in linux, it is the same subsystem, simply different ways to refer to memory pages and file cache. Please note that those are only hints and when memory is in dire, the kernel might decide to swap out or reuse cached data despite the hint. Only mlock() and mlockall() can prevent that.

In your case, not giving any hint may help, especially if some pages are being read more than other, since the kernel will figure out which pages are "hot" and will attempt to keep in memory.

最后

以上就是高贵诺言最近收集整理的关于madvise和fadvise的区别的全部内容，更多相关madvise和fadvise内容请搜索靠谱客的其他文章。