Background & Purpose
- Flux and redux suggests more practice than eslint rules and compile-time issues.
thunkempower developers to do anything, and overuse it in most conditions.- To commit reasonable, maintainable and low-coupling code.
Coding practice
- Avoid use
dispatchin component directly
If we injectdispatchinto components via props(mapDispatch), it couples store and the view component tree becausedispatchis a part of store implementation detail. Besides, dispatching action inside component directly will require us to import action types and other store detail, making the component tree doing too much thing other than “displaying view”. The better practice is to separate action implementation and component view, such that component view doesn’t have to be aware of actions’ implementation and actions are also usable for other components in the same module.
// bad
// ComponentA.js
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import { SPECIFIC_ACTION_TYPE } from '@/actions/types';
const ComponentA = props => (
<button onClick={() => props.dispatch({ type: SPECIFIC_ACTION_TYPE, payload: 'xxx' })}>{props.text}</button>
);
const mapState = state => ({
text: state.text
});
export default connect(mapState)(ComponentA);
// good
// action.js
import { SPECIFIC_ACTION_TYPE } from '@/actions/types';
export const updateContent = content => ({
type: SPECIFIC_ACTION_TYPE,
payload: { content }
});
// ComponentA.js
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import { updateContent } from '@/action';
const ComponentA = props => (
<button onClick={() => props.onClickButton('content')}>{props.text}</button>
);
const mapState = state => ({
text: state.text
});
const mapDispatch = {
onClickButton: updateContent
};
export default connect(mapState, mapDispatch)(ComponentA);
- Apply selectors and reselect for
mapState
Store is a place for storing data and state, but it doesn’t mean that we could only store what’s displayed on the view. Instead, store is an independent module, and it could expose interface for other module to retrieve states. This is where selectors take effects, which act as data derivation in the middle layer between store and component view. Except the advantages of encapsulation, selectors and reselect boost significant performance improvement, since they could reduce unnecessary selectors’ execution and component re-render when store’s state keep unchanged.
// bad
// reducer.js
import { SPECIFI_ACTION_TYPE } from '@/actions/types';
export default (state = { percent: 0 }, { type, payload }) => {
switch (type) {
case SPECIFI_ACTION_TYPE: {
const { point } = payload;
return {
...state,
percent: `${Number.parseInt(point / 100, 10)}%`
};
}
default:
return state;
}
}
// ComponentA.js
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
const ComponentA = props => <p>{props.text}</p>;
const mapState = state => ({
text: state.percent
});
connect(mapState, null)(ComponentA);
// good
// reducer.js
import { SPECIFI_ACTION_TYPE } from '@/actions/types';
export default (state = { point: 0 }, { type, payload }) => {
switch (type) {
case SPECIFI_ACTION_TYPE: {
const { point } = payload;
return {
...state,
point
};
}
default:
return state;
}
}
// selector.js
export const selectPercent = state => `${Number.parseInt(state.point / 100, 10)}%`;
// ComponentA.js
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
const ComponentA = props => <p>{props.text}</p>;
const mapState = state => ({
text: selectPercent(state)
});
connect(mapState, null)(ComponentA);
最后
以上就是愉快大船最近收集整理的关于React-redux app best practice的全部内容,更多相关React-redux内容请搜索靠谱客的其他文章。
本图文内容来源于网友提供,作为学习参考使用,或来自网络收集整理,版权属于原作者所有。
发表评论 取消回复